The Big Bangs

[dannan14]

And you would propose what scenario to plausibly account for the extraordinary levels of radiation found and measured there ?

How bout a link to the evidence Uni? i searched for awhile the other night and came up with nothing.

[Digit]

Now there's a surprise!

Roy.

[Digit]

There you are Dannan, feast your eyes on this...

http://english.pravda.ru/science/19/94/ ... tones.html

... and again....

http://www.s8int.com/atomic1.html

...I'll leave you to work out the problems inherent in the statement.

Roy.

[dannan14]

Yes, i've found many pages like those, but i just can't seem to find out who it was that tested the skeletons for radiation, blah, blah, blah. Oh well. i'll guess i'll spend more time playing poker

[Minimalist]

Hmmm.....

http://www.philipcoppens.com/bestevidence.html

Sceptics have also wondered whether the ancient atomic warfare is not a modern invention, to deflect attention away from a serious – modern – atomic contamination. In 1998, it was reported that some Indian power stations had major problems. One had an incident in which 2000 workers became exposed to excess radiation, 300 of which had to be hospitalised.

Surendra Gadekar investigated the conditions of villagers at Rawatbhatta in Rajasthan and confirmed there were indeed gross radiation-related deformities. We note that Rawatbhatta is in the same region as the discovery of the “ancient warfare” site. But Gadekar did not find evidence of ancient warfare, but did find evidence of modern negligence:

[Digit]

I don't know the background of you two gentlemen but mine is, as I think you know, scientific/engineering and it pains me that people, with no disrespect intended, like Uni, appear to lack that background and accept what is said by those with an agenda as Gospel.
As I pointed out earlier the method of 'Black Propaganda' is to tell the absolute and verifiable truth, you then mix it with difficult to disprove lies, these then become accepted as 'truth!'
I await Uni's response with interest!

Roy.

[Digit]

With no response from Uni, and BTW Uni I am unable to 'open' your link for some reason, I'll plough on.
When a man made explosion takes place much of the explosive material does not detonate, (if anyone wishes to know why I'll explain later,) but is scattered to the four winds. In the case of nuclear explosions Uni only about 25 per cent goes bang!
Now none of the reports on the Indian 'explosions' deal with any of the questions I asked you, hence the reason I asked you as you are deeper into conspiracies than I am.
If the 'explosion' was a man made device the 75 percent of material that did not detonate will have been spread, thus if either enriched Uranium or Plutonium, a man made material, is detected then you can be certain that the explosion was not natural.
Further, an air blast weapon does not produce a crater, that is why they are detonated above ground, a subteranean one, shallow, will as would a ground explosion. Downwind of either would be a radioactive 'plume', think Chernobyl, if any of these are absent then I am afraid Uni that you must look else where for your answers.
Any comments Uni?

Roy.

[Minimalist]

Facts are stubborn things, Dig.

[Digit]

And stubborn are those who won't face them Min.
Jacko wasn't the only one living in 'Neverland.'

Roy.

[uniface]

I await Uni's response with interest!

Response : The next time you bend over to pick something up, may a horny camel mistake you for a female of his species in heat.

How's that ?

[dannan14]

I await Uni's response with interest!

Response : The next time you bend over to pick something up, may a horny camel mistake you for a female of his species in heat.

How's that ?

Wow, that really backs up the points you try to make Uni.

[Digit]

There are no Camels around here Uni so the risk is small, we have to make do with sheep. I take it that's the best 'scientific' response I can expect? Like, rubbish?

Roy.

[uniface]

OK then.

re. your attempting to distance your landsmen from the Soviet regime.

Ethnic Trust Seal of Approval !

http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340 ... 99,00.html

[uniface]

From a source that also passes the ethnic trust test

http://www.rebelnews.org/opinion/histor ... ja-content

[Digit]

I some how can't recall attempting any such thing Uni. Only you seem concerned about people's origins, I simply pointed out that certain people had been through certain religious procedures, I trust you don't wish to dispute that?
If I go through the procedure of Christening then I would be a Christian, which of course you will disagree with, but Judaism, Christianity, Islam, Shintoism etc are entirely independent of ethnicity.
You seem to think that if someone's great grandmother's left handed serving wench had once known a Jew then they are 'tainted'.
Evil has no common parameters in religion.
I also fail to understand why you seem to associate the evils in the world with a Jewish heritage. I pointed out sometime back, which you ignored, that Germany invaded Holland, Belgium etc etc etc, I somehow doubt that there were many Jews in the Nazi hierarchy, doubtless you will know more on that subject than me.
But remember, few people actually care one way or the other, you need a new hobby.
And anyway, what's this got to do with 'nuclear war' in India?

Roy.