Posted: Fri Sep 22, 2006 6:48 pm
Genesis Veracity wrote:Obviously not for you to this point.
Pretty much the first correct thing you have said.
Pretty much the first correct thing you have said.
Archaeologica.org
Your source on the web for daily archaeology news!
https://archaeologica.org/forum/
Internet Trolls
Page 3 of 9
Pretty much the first correct thing you have said.
Posted: Fri Sep 22, 2006 6:53 pm
You are so prone to exaggeration, almost bizarre.
Posted: Fri Sep 22, 2006 7:02 pm
Can all you guys hear yourselves for a second?
Sometimes one wonders in traveling around the net if trolls are not multiplying at an frightening rate.
I've been in the middle of some fierce debates before but this is the messiest board I've seen.
Sometimes one wonders in traveling around the net if trolls are not multiplying at an frightening rate.
I've been in the middle of some fierce debates before but this is the messiest board I've seen.
Posted: Fri Sep 22, 2006 7:46 pm
Here, here...
I mean...hear, hear!
I mean...hear, hear!
Posted: Fri Sep 22, 2006 7:48 pm
Morganna - you are of course right. And we all keep advising each other not to feed the trolls, and then one of them makes this assinine statement and human nature kicks in. We should be stronger, but some things just drive you over the edge, know what I mean?
Posted: Fri Sep 22, 2006 7:52 pm
Oas, 'cause you're supposedly so right, and I'm supposedly so wrong? That's a hoot.
Posted: Fri Sep 22, 2006 7:53 pm
Posted: Fri Sep 22, 2006 7:54 pm
read thread ".......and not a week later", if you haven't done so already.oldarchystudent wrote:Morganna - you are of course right. And we all keep advising each other not to feed the trolls, and then one of them makes this assinine statement and human nature kicks in. We should be stronger, but some things just drive you over the edge, know what I mean?
j
Posted: Fri Sep 22, 2006 7:55 pm
Still waiting for your comment on the varying length of a royal cubit.Genesis Veracity wrote:Oas, 'cause you're supposedly so right, and I'm supposedly so wrong? That's a hoot.
Still waiting for your unknowable presuppositions that govern dating techniques.
Still waiting for your response on creationists misleading the gullible on Potassium Argon dating.
Posted: Fri Sep 22, 2006 7:57 pm
I have - and I have to apologise to all the non-lunatic people for my part in this. I shouldn't feed 'em....john wrote:read thread ".......and not a week later", if you haven't done so already.oldarchystudent wrote:Morganna - you are of course right. And we all keep advising each other not to feed the trolls, and then one of them makes this assinine statement and human nature kicks in. We should be stronger, but some things just drive you over the edge, know what I mean?
j
Posted: Fri Sep 22, 2006 7:57 pm
I'm waiting for about a fifty answers from you, so you've got a ways to go.
Posted: Fri Sep 22, 2006 7:59 pm
The information I posted in relation to those questions are my answers. Did I miss something?Genesis Veracity wrote:I'm waiting for about a fifty answers from you, so you've got a ways to go.
Posted: Fri Sep 22, 2006 7:59 pm
.....the dog continues to salivate .........Genesis Veracity wrote:I'm waiting for about a fifty answers from you, so you've got a ways to go.
......the clock ticks........
j
Posted: Fri Sep 22, 2006 8:00 pm
Plenty.
Posted: Fri Sep 22, 2006 8:42 pm
well this board has taken on new life. i go away fro a couple hours and presto 1000 posts are up (i know--a slight exaggeration but you get the point)
with G.V. around i am certainly not needed tospark fierce debate but i don't know what to call the conversation he initiates--it certainly isn't anything worth participating in.
that is just my two cents worth on this topic as i see it slide down hill further and further.
with G.V. around i am certainly not needed tospark fierce debate but i don't know what to call the conversation he initiates--it certainly isn't anything worth participating in.
that is just my two cents worth on this topic as i see it slide down hill further and further.