ice age civilisations by James Nienhuis (Book Review)

ed · Post by ed » Wed Sep 13, 2006 6:21 am

Jim. I see that your publisher is actually you. I thought for a bit that it was a vanity press but now I see that it is far beyond that.

Pathetic.

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Wed Sep 13, 2006 6:22 am

Intellects far superior to yours love my book, ouch.

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Wed Sep 13, 2006 6:22 am

ed · Post by ed » Wed Sep 13, 2006 6:25 am

Genesis Veracity wrote:Off by .5% measuring the earth with a simple hand-held device (Celtic Cross), not bad, wouldn't you say?

And how do you explain all those precession numbers in ancient legends, just coincidence? Now put on your thinking cap.

Close but not equal.

Tell me, does the measurement of the base consider the lost sheething? How do you define the "base"? Is the ground around perfectly level? Suppose they excaveated 5 feet deeper and came up with a new "base"?

This is simply numerology. Probably sinful, certainly silly.

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Wed Sep 13, 2006 6:25 am

I guess it is your little "secret," just as I suspected.

ed · Post by ed » Wed Sep 13, 2006 6:26 am

Genesis Veracity wrote:Intellects far superior to yours love my book, ouch.

My intellect is pretty darn superior. I doubt your claim.

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Wed Sep 13, 2006 6:28 am

If it's "silly" to figure the ancient origin of our mapping and timekeeping system, why the length of the royal cubit was selected, and why the Great Pyramid is 440 royal cubits/base-side, then you should not be writing definitions for dictionaries, although, thankfully, I have a sneaking suspicion that will never happen.

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Wed Sep 13, 2006 6:29 am

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Wed Sep 13, 2006 6:29 am

Your intellect is supposedly superior to what?

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Wed Sep 13, 2006 6:32 am

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Wed Sep 13, 2006 6:33 am

Once again X, you reveal your ignorance of the model, what you're doing is like trying to explain away gravity by talking about wind, apples and oranges baby.

ed · Post by ed » Wed Sep 13, 2006 6:35 am

Genesis Veracity wrote:Once again X, you reveal your ignorance of the model, what you're doing is like trying to explain away gravity by talking about wind, apples and oranges baby.

Back on the subject...

The length of the base is defined how exactly?

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Wed Sep 13, 2006 6:37 am

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Wed Sep 13, 2006 6:38 am

ed · Post by ed » Wed Sep 13, 2006 6:39 am

Stephen: [to William and the others] The Almighty says don't change the subject; just answer the fucking question.

-Braveheart