Archaeologica.org

John, do you mean evolution, or do you mean Darwinian evolution, you didn't specify, you should define your terms so we know what you're talking about!

The science of evolution (which is real, in spite of your foolish beliefs) relates only to one question. Did humanity evolve to its present form?

the answer to that is no but you won't listen. if that is its only purpose then it is of no value.

It does not burn people at the stake if they do not believe it

actually that is only true in a literal sense. what evolutionists do to people who don't believe is astonishing. when a small publisher printed an article on i.d. in his tiny newsletter, the smithsonian went ballistic and you shouldhave seen what they did to that man and he wasn't even a christian.

paint the whole story please.

the rest of your post is not worth responding to as it undermines any credibility you have and denies your claim to objectivity. you have issues you need to deal with...

I'm still trying to figure out if Darwinites think that we morphed from tree shrews or from monkeys, could someone clarify this?

we evolved from the same common ancestor as apes
really Jim
if you're going to ridicule something you really should show that you know what it is you are mocking first

And Marduk, what is that "same common ancestor?" (This oughta be good.)

iirc it was called Dryopithecus
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dryopithecus

Then Marduk, why do many Darwinites say it's the tree shrew, and others say the monkey, and others say the "Dryopithecus?"

And Marduk, the wiki says Dryo was an ape, back to the drawing board.

They don't say humans evolved from a tree shrew
you are just misquoting based on your limited understanding of a process that you don't subscribe to
thats fair enough if you don't like it then why push your beliefs on those that do
i don't see anyone smashing you round the head with a hammer screaming "God doesnt exist, God doesnt exist"

Why is it back to the drawing board
apes and humans are cousins
monkeys are an entirely different species
they all had a common ancestory
but you have to go further back to find it
its called Proconsul
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proconsul_(genus)
yes i know you never heard of it
neither has anyone else

They can't decide if the Proconsul is an ape or a monkey, so that makes it our ancestor? That would be a great name for a kid, after a distant ancestor, Proconsul (sounds kinda Goth).

They can't decide if the Proconsul is an ape or a monkey

thats the whole point Jim
its both and neither
its descendants were monkeys and apes
then later we evolved from the apes
we never evolved from monkeys but are realted to them through proconsul
like you are related to Adolf Hitler through a distant ancestor
this is Darwinian evolution
the tree shrews were much earlier

and probably more intelligent
(i.e.) they knew staying in the trees was a good idea

Can I quote you on that?

well thats just their opinions so quote them
my opinion is that leaving the oceans was the bad idea

Do you think that, according to Darwinism, we morphed out of the sea as walking catfish, or as amphibians?

Do you think that the wolf morphed into the whale? (Kinda reminds me of the way Citizen Attorney phrases questions, he's a trip.)

walking catfish are amphibians
doh

Do you think that the wolf morphed into the whale? (Kinda reminds me of the way Citizen Attorney phrases questions, he's a trip.)

now youre really getting confused
wolves morphed into dogs
any 5 year old knows that
go ask one