Current Biblical Archaeology

Frank Harrist · Post by **Frank Harrist** » Sat Jul 29, 2006 8:11 am

Whatever.......

marduk · Post by **marduk** » Sat Jul 29, 2006 8:42 am

Post by **Minimalist** » Sat Jul 29, 2006 9:47 am

Frank Harrist wrote:Does being religious make one honest?

Quite the opposite, really.

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Sat Jul 29, 2006 4:11 pm

Darwin has not been debunked

yes he has, you just don't listen those people who have done so.

I think he means that in the eyes of the church

no, not in the eyes of the church but those scientists, researtchers who have studied, investigated and have demonstrated the impossibilty of evolution and darwin's theory.

How do you know he was non-religious

research but then again i shouldhave said not a christian , maybe instead of non-religious a s there are many religions in the world whose adherents are considered religious.

oh so because he wasn't religious he can't possibly be right
you complete Bigot Arch, whats wrong with you

i think reseaqrch has borne that out andhow would that make me a complete bigot? a lot of non-christian researchers have said true things.

Does being religious make one honest?

unfortunately, not always.

no they just dont do research in certain areas

that can be both good and bad while i am sure non-religious researchers can be guilty of this exact same habit...minamilist sticks to dever and finkelstein, so i think that is a good example of it being true for the opposite side ofthe fence.

Post by **Minimalist** » Sat Jul 29, 2006 4:37 pm

Quote:
Darwin has not been debunked

yes he has, you just don't listen those people who have done so.

And there we have the root of the problem. Ignore what you don't like and embrace what you do, regardless of the evidence.

It's the exact game plan for how Bush wound up in Iraq, Arch.

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Sat Jul 29, 2006 4:48 pm

And there we have the root of the problem. Ignore what you don't like and embrace what you do, regardless of the evidence

which also applies to those evolutionists, and other non-christian researchers who do the exact same thing.

It's the exact game plan for how Bush wound up in Iraq, Arch.

yues, it is a dangerous game especially inthe hands of fools.

Post by **Minimalist** » Sat Jul 29, 2006 4:51 pm

Unfortunately, Science keeps digging things up while you bible-thumpers can only repeat the same old stuff, over and over. Repeating it does not make it true.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story ... 06,00.html

The fossil skulls of two adults and a child who lived and died 160,000 years ago in the Afar region of Ethiopia are the oldest representatives of Homo sapiens, scientists will report today.

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Sat Jul 29, 2006 5:26 pm

The fossil skulls of two adults and a child who lived and died 160,000 years ago in the Afar region of Ethiopia are the oldest representatives of Homo sapiens, scientists will report today.

how do you know the dates are correct and not corrupted by the flood waters? you put a lot of faith in a fallible and corruptible system.

the other question remians, since we only have archaeological evidence for about 10,000 years of human existence, how did these so-called ancestors survive? live? build? and so on. there is no evidence archaeologically to support such existence at such a time.

marduk · Post by **marduk** » Sat Jul 29, 2006 5:57 pm

how do you know the dates are correct and not corrupted by the flood waters? you put a lot of faith in a fallible and corruptible system.

the other question remians, since we only have archaeological evidence for about 10,000 years of human existence, how did these so-called ancestors survive? live? build? and so on. there is no evidence archaeologically to support such existence at such a time.

i find it extremely funny that people even bother to respond to your posts with any degree of quality
theyre clearly wasting their time aren't they
i think i'm going to start a new thread if you carry on like this Arch
it will be a petition for your permanent banning
I'm sure the vote will be both overwhelming and unanimous
you are a waste of space for anyone who posts here
you have nothing to add but your bigotry
and you have nothing to gain because you don't listen
so why even bother
one more ridiculous faith based outburst from you and I'll post a poll in your honour
ok

Post by **Minimalist** » Sat Jul 29, 2006 7:26 pm

it will be a petition for your permanent banning

I would never support such a petition.

What fun would bayonet practice be if there were no dummy?

marduk · Post by **marduk** » Sat Jul 29, 2006 7:46 pm

you could maybe give up Bayonet practice and concentrate on valid discussion

Post by **Minimalist** » Sat Jul 29, 2006 7:54 pm

Did I ever mention that I have a replica Brown Bess and bayonet?

john · Post by **john** » Sat Jul 29, 2006 8:04 pm

Minimalist wrote:Did I ever mention that I have a replica Brown Bess and bayonet?

minimalist, minimalist

grasshopper, grasshopper

ATLATL PRACTICE

gotta be in synch with prehistory ..................

john

Post by **Minimalist** » Sat Jul 29, 2006 8:12 pm

I've got a bad arm from 14 years coaching Little League.
An atlatl is out of the question.

Sometimes my arm hurts even loading the musket!

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Sun Jul 30, 2006 12:11 am

i think i'm going to start a new thread if you carry on like this Arch
it will be a petition for your permanent banning

why because i question the longevity of your theory of a long civilization history?

you are a waste of space for anyone who posts here
you have nothing to add but your bigotry

i could say the exact same thing for you here and your proposed actions will demonstrate how much lessof a person you are as i have never asked for anyone to be banned no matter how crazy or abusive they get.

one more ridiculous faith based outburst from you

i amnot being ridiculous and my comment came from a respected source whichi did neglect to mention for obvious reasons.

the only people who show any ridiculousness and bigotry are those like you, tj and a few others who cannot stand to be challenged or face those who believe differently than you.

i and those that agree with me have the right to believe what we want and the last time i looked, you did not own this website so if you do not like it why don't you go backto where you came from, at least i stay within the rules and post my opinions with as many facts if not more than you