Posted: Fri Dec 15, 2006 4:24 am
Another story for you Bruce. Some years ago I took over the test dept of a company and was horrified to find that product testing was being done in lab type conditions. I promptly introduced fresh procedures as near as user conditions as possible. This didn't go down well with some of the older hands, so I told them this story.
The senior game warden of the Ugandan National parks was on leave in Britain when he was contacted by the CEO of a major British gun manufacturer, inviting him to call on his company when convenient. Which he did.
The warden was treated to a sumptuous lunch and then berated by the CEO on account that the wardens used Mauser military rifles, when his company produced a far superior weapon.
The warden was invited to test one of the guns and was taken into the basement, where the company had a shooting range, and shown the rifle that the CEO was so proud of. Larger calibre, clip in mag for rapid loading, heavier round, higher velocity etc.
The CEO then took the rifle, inserted a round, sighted, squeezed the trigger then proudly offered it to the warden.
"Is the way in which you carry out tests?" he asked.
Being assured that every rifle was thus tested he took the weapon, loaded a magazine, clipped it into place, operated the bolt and squeezed the trigger,-- when to the immense horror of the CEO the magazine dropped out.
"That's why we use the Mauser!" he was informed.
I had no further complaints about the new procedures I was pushing through.
The senior game warden of the Ugandan National parks was on leave in Britain when he was contacted by the CEO of a major British gun manufacturer, inviting him to call on his company when convenient. Which he did.
The warden was treated to a sumptuous lunch and then berated by the CEO on account that the wardens used Mauser military rifles, when his company produced a far superior weapon.
The warden was invited to test one of the guns and was taken into the basement, where the company had a shooting range, and shown the rifle that the CEO was so proud of. Larger calibre, clip in mag for rapid loading, heavier round, higher velocity etc.
The CEO then took the rifle, inserted a round, sighted, squeezed the trigger then proudly offered it to the warden.
"Is the way in which you carry out tests?" he asked.
Being assured that every rifle was thus tested he took the weapon, loaded a magazine, clipped it into place, operated the bolt and squeezed the trigger,-- when to the immense horror of the CEO the magazine dropped out.
"That's why we use the Mauser!" he was informed.
I had no further complaints about the new procedures I was pushing through.