Archaeologica.org

Genesis Veracity wrote:Ed, the water in lava is easy to google, I'm not a library.

Form a concise question, and I'll answer it, but the premise must be based on the GFM, otherwise, you're just talking apples and oranges.

You didn't say that. You said magma.

Doctor X wrote:Essan:


Now, perhaps you find long threads with pictures and quotes, and citations, and whatnot intimidating, taxing--even boring. That is your right.

No, I just find constant childish insults dull and boring - and they put me off trying to dig the wheat out from the chafe.

Still, it's quite clear my opinions aren't appreciated here atm anyway - I was getting pretty fed up as it was with the way my attempts to have a meaningful debate with Arch on the Noahs Flood thread were being constantly thwarted.

I think I'd be better off spending my time studying the impact of late Weichsellian climate changes on mammoth populations in the Tamiyr or summat

Doctor X

Pre-Flood ocean about 1 mile deep on average (now 2 miles)

Pre-Flood continents 1 mile high elevation tops

Fountains of the Deep caused water in oceans to double, 40 days and nights of "rain," which was the fountains shooting high into the sky until the water rose enough to carburate that water source for rain, to soon thereafter cover the continents.

New ocean bottoms of lava lithified, gaining density, and sinking down upon the mantle, so the water slid off the the then thickened continents into the then deepening ocean basins.

Right, magma.

Allright this is the last time I'm going to warn you all to knock off the insults. Doc you're going over the line and GV you aren't totally without blame here eitther. Surley you have done research for your book. Show us some references or something. You really haven't contributed much to our enlightenment. Not all of us can afford to buy your book so fill us in a little.

I'm not in the greatest of moods. I just got fired.

Frank, sorry to hear you lost your job, just go do what you love to do, what do you do when you have free time, what is it you love? Do that.

The composition of magma is easy to learn about, just google (or yahoo, or altavista, or ask) water composition of magma (or something like that).

The GFM material is an interpretation of the field data, with much more explanatory power than uniformitarian geology, which, for all practical purposes, has been discarded, because most geologists acknowledge the catastrophic nature of the geologic column, so the GFM is actually closer to mainstream thinking than is the uniformitarian model.

X, the crust of the earth is like the skin on an apple, very thin, and the depth of the oceans is even less than that, so you appear to be far afield.

Genesis Veracity wrote:Right, magma.

70% water.

Reference?

X, it's sad to see that you won't do the necessary reading.

How much water by weight do you think is in magam, 5%?

And you still haven't cited any flaw in my ancient mapping finding, have you read and understood it?

Doctor X wrote:
Methinks you may, in all sincerity, wish to take a break from what is, in the great scheme of things, only an internet board.

--J.D.

And let you guys play without adult supervision? Not a chance. Besides I have nothing else to do at present. The last couple posts were much better. See you can play nice.

Oh and thanks for the "concolences". I ain't dead yet! I ain't staying down either. I'm the man! yeah