Anthropologists Try to Muddy the Waters

Random older topics of discussion

Moderators: MichelleH, Minimalist, JPeters

Locked
Minimalist
Forum Moderator
Posts: 16036
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 1:09 pm
Location: Arizona

Anthropologists Try to Muddy the Waters

Post by Minimalist »

http://www.unm.edu/~market/cgi-bin/archives/001718.html
recent case regarding repatriation of even older remains and artifacts from Spirit Cave, Nev., suggests that the Kennewick Man case should be used as a legal precedent and that the remains of Spirit Cave Man are not Native American.

Four University of New Mexico anthropologists have written an article where they suggest that a precedent in Paleoindian human remains is “inappropriate and unnecessary.” They claim that each case is unique and that repatriation determination should be handled case-by-case.

Law, however, is based on precedential decisions. The trick is in determining if the facts of each case are similar enough to warrant or mandate the use of the precedent.
Something is wrong here. War, disease, death, destruction, hunger, filth, poverty, torture, crime, corruption, and the Ice Capades. Something is definitely wrong. This is not good work. If this is the best God can do, I am not impressed.

-- George Carlin
Beagle
Posts: 4746
Joined: Fri Apr 14, 2006 2:39 am
Location: Tennessee

Post by Beagle »

It will be a sticky situation for sure, but it would sure be nice to not go through a case like Kennewick man again. That case took years.
kbs2244
Posts: 2472
Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 12:47 pm

Post by kbs2244 »

To steal somebody’s phrase "We got precedent! We win!"
User avatar
Cognito
Posts: 1615
Joined: Fri Jul 28, 2006 10:37 am
Location: Southern California

Double Standard

Post by Cognito »

Four University of New Mexico anthropologists have written an article where they suggest that a precedent in Paleoindian human remains is “inappropriate and unnecessary.” They claim that each case is unique and that repatriation determination should be handled case-by-case.
"Aw, crap! We lost that one, Peckerwood, so let's change the rules!"

So ... does this mean that if they are fortunate enough to win just one case, they'll return to legal precedent? :evil:
Natural selection favors the paranoid
Locked