Some Women will say we're Still Cavemen

Random older topics of discussion

Moderators: MichelleH, Minimalist, JPeters

Minimalist
Forum Moderator
Posts: 16036
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 1:09 pm
Location: Arizona

Some Women will say we're Still Cavemen

Post by Minimalist »

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,269115,00.html
He may have come down from the trees, but prehistoric man did not stop swinging. New research into Stone Age humans has argued that, far from having intercourse simply to reproduce, they had sex for fun.

Practices ranging from bondage to group sex, transvestism and the use of sex toys were widespread in primitive societies as a way of building up cultural ties.

According to the study, a 30,000-year-old statue of a naked woman -- the Venus of Willendorf -- and an equally ancient stone phallus found in a German cave, provide the earliest direct evidence that sex was about far more than babies.
Something is wrong here. War, disease, death, destruction, hunger, filth, poverty, torture, crime, corruption, and the Ice Capades. Something is definitely wrong. This is not good work. If this is the best God can do, I am not impressed.

-- George Carlin
Forum Monk
Posts: 1999
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2006 5:37 pm
Location: USA

Post by Forum Monk »

Prehistoric porn. The question, is man wired for porn and lust for sexual imagery or is it learned. Some apes, appear to engage in strange practices, but lust of imagery seems to be a distinctly human trait.
Rokcet Scientist

Post by Rokcet Scientist »

"Pornography"? Then what IS "pornography", really? Is there a definition that can be applied in practice to determine whether something is pornography or isn't?

I submit there is no agreement on a definition of what constitutes pornography, and what doesn't. Therefore the use of the word pornography is suggestive. And the intention of that suggestion is that pornography is supposed to be 'wrong'. Even 'criminal', if the religious right gets its way. To say the least.

So let's use the word 'sex'. Not 'pornography'!

Sex in archaeology is indeed "as old as the world" (of course). Some religions even put it central to their doctrine. Like this Hindu temple illustrates (Mini's already seen these):

[center]Image[/center]

But you need to see it closer-up:
[center]Image[/center]

Closer-up still:
[center]Image[/center]

Closer-up:
[center]Image[/center]

Closer-up:
[center]Image[/center]

Closer-up:
[center]Image[/center]

Closer-up:
[center]Image[/center]

And this is of course what it's all about:
[center]Image[/center]

Obviously, Bonobo chimpanzees are much brighter than man: when they disagree, they screw! Instead of making war. And that works! They screw eachother all day everyday to keep the peace in their society.
We should try that too!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bonobo

[center]Image[/center]

[center]Image[/center]

[center]Image[/center]
Ishtar
Posts: 2631
Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2007 1:41 am
Location: UK
Contact:

Post by Ishtar »

Forum Monk wrote:Some apes appear to engage in strange practices, but lust of imagery seems to be a distinctly human trait.
Has anyone asked the animals, then? :lol:
Ishtar
Posts: 2631
Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2007 1:41 am
Location: UK
Contact:

Post by Ishtar »

Rokcet Scientist wrote:" And the intention of that suggestion is that pornography is supposed to be 'wrong'. Even 'criminal', if the religious right gets its way. To say the least.
Only when you're doing it right! :lol:
Forum Monk
Posts: 1999
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2006 5:37 pm
Location: USA

Post by Forum Monk »

No, no, no. I am not crimalizing anything and I am not specifically referring to sex in its many variants. I am referring to visual images and the effect they have on the species. I am talking about depictions, i.e. statues, carvings, pictures, paintings, etchings, of imagery, which sexually arouses individuals and its intent is to so. I don't care about the politics or religion of it. Just the science of it.

I made this post last night wondering if the arousal by sexual imagery was a uniquely human characteristic. Then today on CNN there is news about how zoo officials in China are using videos of Pandas having sex to stimulate other male Pandas. Apprarently this is meeting with success either through the visuals or the sound, one of the two. So perhaps its not only humans who are affected by porn.

btw - I can only read this thread from home because our stupid web filter at work sees the word porn or sex more than a few times in conjunction with R/S's jpegs - and pow - the page is blocked.
Rokcet Scientist

Post by Rokcet Scientist »

Honi soît qui mal y pense!

Image
Minimalist
Forum Moderator
Posts: 16036
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 1:09 pm
Location: Arizona

Post by Minimalist »

Panda porn....how quaint.

You know, Hinduism could gain a lot of recruits on college campuses if they would just play up that line of thinking and play down the "sacred cow" stuff.
Something is wrong here. War, disease, death, destruction, hunger, filth, poverty, torture, crime, corruption, and the Ice Capades. Something is definitely wrong. This is not good work. If this is the best God can do, I am not impressed.

-- George Carlin
Ishtar
Posts: 2631
Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2007 1:41 am
Location: UK
Contact:

Post by Ishtar »

Minimalist wrote:Panda porn....how quaint.

You know, Hinduism could gain a lot of recruits on college campuses if they would just play up that line of thinking and play down the "sacred cow" stuff.
India's the only country I've been to where the men are more interested in money than they are in sex.
Rokcet Scientist

Post by Rokcet Scientist »

Ishtar wrote:
Minimalist wrote:Panda porn....how quaint.

You know, Hinduism could gain a lot of recruits on college campuses if they would just play up that line of thinking and play down the "sacred cow" stuff.
India's the only country I've been to where the men are more interested in money than they are in sex.
Is that a little field test you do in every country you visit, Ishtar? Like, it's your 'contribution to science'...? LOL! :lol:
Well, we do what we're good at, don't we? LOL! :lol:

Lemme know when you'll be testing western €urope, LOL! :lol:
Hey, you're copying Rocco Siffredi's travels and travails, aren't you? LOL! :lol:

Don't need to wish you fun... anymore would likely kill you! LOL! :lol:
Ishtar
Posts: 2631
Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2007 1:41 am
Location: UK
Contact:

Post by Ishtar »

yeah, I tested every one of them, Rokcet!

I'll let you know when I'm heading your way....if you think you're man enough, that is! :lol:
Leona Conner
Posts: 476
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2005 7:40 am
Location: Tennessee

Post by Leona Conner »

Forum Monk wrote:No, no, no. I am not crimalizing anything and I am not specifically referring to sex in its many variants. I am referring to visual images and the effect they have on the species. I am talking about depictions, i.e. statues, carvings, pictures, paintings, etchings, of imagery, which sexually arouses individuals and its intent is to so. I don't care about the politics or religion of it. Just the science of it.

I made this post last night wondering if the arousal by sexual imagery was a uniquely human characteristic. Then today on CNN there is news about how zoo officials in China are using videos of Pandas having sex to stimulate other male Pandas. Apprarently this is meeting with success either through the visuals or the sound, one of the two. So perhaps its not only humans who are affected by porn.

btw - I can only read this thread from home because our stupid web filter at work sees the word porn or sex more than a few times in conjunction with R/S's jpegs - and pow - the page is blocked.
So if you're not aroused by a picture then it's not porn. Good point. But if true then millions of women get aroused by seeing a picture of George Clooney in a tux. I know I do and I'm an old gray mare.

Of course pron is like beauty, it's all in the mind of the beholder. If you are not offended that's okay, but if it should offend you then it's bad. The Victorians were offended by the works of Michaelangelo and were omitted from tours. Heard the good ladies often fainted from the sight of a male.

Like you I too can read only from home because of the filters at work. Damn banks.
Minimalist
Forum Moderator
Posts: 16036
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 1:09 pm
Location: Arizona

Post by Minimalist »

LOL, Leona.


I have a very good friend who went to see The 300 and came back salivating at the Spartans. I had to tell her that the Spartans really did not fight in loin cloths but in Bronze Armor from head to toe.

She was really disappointed.
Something is wrong here. War, disease, death, destruction, hunger, filth, poverty, torture, crime, corruption, and the Ice Capades. Something is definitely wrong. This is not good work. If this is the best God can do, I am not impressed.

-- George Carlin
Rokcet Scientist

Post by Rokcet Scientist »

Ishtar wrote:yeah, I tested every one of them, Rokcet!

I'll let you know when I'm heading your way....if you think you're man enough, that is! :lol:
Loser makes breakfast 8)

Bacon & scrambled eggs, 3 lightly buttered fresh toasts, honey, fresh OJ, and a hot cup of coffee for me please...
User avatar
Cognito
Posts: 1615
Joined: Fri Jul 28, 2006 10:37 am
Location: Southern California

Breakfast

Post by Cognito »

Loser makes breakfast

Bacon & scrambled eggs, 3 lightly buttered fresh toasts, honey, fresh OJ, and a hot cup of coffee for me please...
Ishtar, when you get to the States I would like the same menu as R/S, but hold the coffee, thank you. Do I get an attaboy if you cannot walk in the morning? 8)
Natural selection favors the paranoid
Locked