Archery...older than HSS?

The science or study of primitive societies and the nature of man.

Moderators: MichelleH, Minimalist, JPeters

Post Reply
Minimalist
Forum Moderator
Posts: 16015
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 1:09 pm
Location: Arizona

Archery...older than HSS?

Post by Minimalist »

http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg2 ... nline-news
BOWS and arrows may not be the preserve of modern humans. It seems that simple stone blades make adequate arrowheads, so they might have been used in lightweight projectile weapons as far back as 100,000 years ago, when the blades first appeared.
Something is wrong here. War, disease, death, destruction, hunger, filth, poverty, torture, crime, corruption, and the Ice Capades. Something is definitely wrong. This is not good work. If this is the best God can do, I am not impressed.

-- George Carlin
User avatar
Sam Salmon
Posts: 349
Joined: Sun Mar 12, 2006 9:30 am
Location: Vancouver-by-the-Sea

Re: Archery...older than HSS?

Post by Sam Salmon »

Atlatal not B & A.
Minimalist
Forum Moderator
Posts: 16015
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 1:09 pm
Location: Arizona

Re: Archery...older than HSS?

Post by Minimalist »

Why not both? Different weapons for different targets. In fact, keeping a big thrusting spear around to finish off a big animal seems like a pretty solid idea, too.
Something is wrong here. War, disease, death, destruction, hunger, filth, poverty, torture, crime, corruption, and the Ice Capades. Something is definitely wrong. This is not good work. If this is the best God can do, I am not impressed.

-- George Carlin
Rokcet Scientist

Re: Archery...older than HSS?

Post by Rokcet Scientist »

older than HSS?
I think we need some definitions here.

Is HSS younger than 100,000 years BCE? If so, then when (approximately) did he rear his ugly head first in your opinion, Min?
Afaik HSS' predecessor – HS – is supposed to have risen around 200,000 years BCE. The question is: from what hominid did HS evolve? From Homo Erectus? From Homo Heidelbergensis? Or was the latter only HN's ancestor?
Minimalist
Forum Moderator
Posts: 16015
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 1:09 pm
Location: Arizona

Re: Archery...older than HSS?

Post by Minimalist »

They don't say where these points were found but Levallois is generally considered to be HNS. If HNS was using them 100,000 years ago then, according to the OOA theory, they were doing so without influence from HSS because we didn't arrive on the scene until c 40,000 BC.

Of course, if OOA turns out to be full of shit then all bets are off, aren't they?
Something is wrong here. War, disease, death, destruction, hunger, filth, poverty, torture, crime, corruption, and the Ice Capades. Something is definitely wrong. This is not good work. If this is the best God can do, I am not impressed.

-- George Carlin
Rokcet Scientist

Re: Archery...older than HSS?

Post by Rokcet Scientist »

Minimalist wrote:They don't say where these points were found but Levallois is generally considered to be HNS. If HNS was using them 100,000 years ago then, according to the OOA theory, they were doing so without influence from HSS because we didn't arrive on the scene until c 40,000 BC.
Huh? Afaik genetic tracing has concluded that HS(S?) left Africa in 2 waves. One a little over 100,000 BCE and the other a little over 70,000 BCE.

What does that "40,000 BC" allude to, Min? Is that when HSS and HN are supposed to have met in Europe?
Minimalist
Forum Moderator
Posts: 16015
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 1:09 pm
Location: Arizona

Re: Archery...older than HSS?

Post by Minimalist »

Supposedly when HSS came into contact with HNS.
Something is wrong here. War, disease, death, destruction, hunger, filth, poverty, torture, crime, corruption, and the Ice Capades. Something is definitely wrong. This is not good work. If this is the best God can do, I am not impressed.

-- George Carlin
User avatar
Digit
Posts: 6618
Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2006 1:22 pm
Location: Wales, UK

Re: Archery...older than HSS?

Post by Digit »

I made the point on the 'other' forum that arrows, and probably spears as well, could well pre date flint points.
Fire hardened arrows as a MK One seems logical. Also bone points would have been much simpler to attach to a wooden shaft than stone ones.
I can't believe that archery achieved it's final development over night.

Roy.
First people deny a thing, then they belittle it, then they say it was known all along! Von Humboldt
Minimalist
Forum Moderator
Posts: 16015
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 1:09 pm
Location: Arizona

Re: Archery...older than HSS?

Post by Minimalist »

Indeed, Roy.

You know, The Club holds to the line that it wasn't until HSS that humans could think of much of anything. But if they had devised boats that could sail the Pacific is it really rocket science to devise a bow? Or an atlatl. Is it even that difficult to realize that these weapons serve better for different targets?

Maybe that's why they seek to hold the line on the "stupid cave man" model? Because once they acknowledge the tech skills of HE they let the genie out of the bottle.
Something is wrong here. War, disease, death, destruction, hunger, filth, poverty, torture, crime, corruption, and the Ice Capades. Something is definitely wrong. This is not good work. If this is the best God can do, I am not impressed.

-- George Carlin
User avatar
Digit
Posts: 6618
Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2006 1:22 pm
Location: Wales, UK

Re: Archery...older than HSS?

Post by Digit »

What always pisses me off Min is their apparent inability to see that many of their statements make them look far more stupid than any cave dweller.

Roy.
First people deny a thing, then they belittle it, then they say it was known all along! Von Humboldt
Minimalist
Forum Moderator
Posts: 16015
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 1:09 pm
Location: Arizona

Re: Archery...older than HSS?

Post by Minimalist »

Image
Something is wrong here. War, disease, death, destruction, hunger, filth, poverty, torture, crime, corruption, and the Ice Capades. Something is definitely wrong. This is not good work. If this is the best God can do, I am not impressed.

-- George Carlin
Post Reply