Headstrong, stupid, or both?

Here's where you get off topic and off center....Keep it nice, keep it clean, no sniping, no flaming. After that, anything goes.

Moderators: MichelleH, Minimalist, JPeters

Rokcet Scientist

Headstrong, stupid, or both?

Post by Rokcet Scientist »

Incredible as it may seem, 400 years after geocentrism was revealed for what it was, namely wishful thinking, there are still plenty of believers (besides Arch). Witness this conference on this coming 10th of November: http://www.galileowaswrong.com/galileowaswrong/.

It may be entertaining to see who attends.
kbs2244
Posts: 2472
Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 12:47 pm

Re: Headstrong, stupid, or both?

Post by kbs2244 »

WOW!
That is about a days drive from me.
It would almost be worth it to attend.
14 hours is a long day though.

They did pick a good location.
South Bend is where Notre Dame University is.
It is one of the largest, if not the largest, Catholic schools in the US.

I wonder if there will be a “Second Annual?”
Minimalist
Forum Moderator
Posts: 16036
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 1:09 pm
Location: Arizona

Re: Headstrong, stupid, or both?

Post by Minimalist »

This popped up on Atheist Forums a day or two ago.


http://atheistforums.org/thread-4717.html



Astonishing.
Something is wrong here. War, disease, death, destruction, hunger, filth, poverty, torture, crime, corruption, and the Ice Capades. Something is definitely wrong. This is not good work. If this is the best God can do, I am not impressed.

-- George Carlin
Rokcet Scientist

Re: Headstrong, stupid, or both?

Post by Rokcet Scientist »

kbs2244 wrote:WOW!
That is about a days drive from me.
It would almost be worth it to attend.
14 hours is a long day though.
Are you considering attending?
If so, what do you expect to learn?
kbs2244
Posts: 2472
Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 12:47 pm

Re: Headstrong, stupid, or both?

Post by kbs2244 »

I doubt I will attend.
It would be a 3 day affair.
Plus the cost.
I might have some interest in the proceedings report though.

Reason?
Morbid curiosity, I guess.
Minimalist
Forum Moderator
Posts: 16036
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 1:09 pm
Location: Arizona

Re: Headstrong, stupid, or both?

Post by Minimalist »

They should do a double bill with the Flat Earth Society.
Something is wrong here. War, disease, death, destruction, hunger, filth, poverty, torture, crime, corruption, and the Ice Capades. Something is definitely wrong. This is not good work. If this is the best God can do, I am not impressed.

-- George Carlin
kbs2244
Posts: 2472
Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 12:47 pm

Re: Headstrong, stupid, or both?

Post by kbs2244 »

Actually,
Wasn't that the doctrine of the day?
Minimalist
Forum Moderator
Posts: 16036
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 1:09 pm
Location: Arizona

Re: Headstrong, stupid, or both?

Post by Minimalist »

If the "day" was the 13th century.
Something is wrong here. War, disease, death, destruction, hunger, filth, poverty, torture, crime, corruption, and the Ice Capades. Something is definitely wrong. This is not good work. If this is the best God can do, I am not impressed.

-- George Carlin
Rokcet Scientist

Re: Headstrong, stupid, or both?

Post by Rokcet Scientist »

kbs2244 wrote:Actually,
Wasn't that the doctrine of the day?
No, they had officially left the 'flat earth doctrine' after Christoforo Colombo, commissioned by their Most Catholic Majesties the King and Queen of Spain, had proved the world was round by sailing to India in 1492 :lol:
At least that's what everybody thought for 25/30 years until Fernão de Magalhães' expedition of 1519-1522 actually completed the first global circumnavigation in modern recorded (but seriously flawed, imo) history.

Image
Fernão de Magalhães

Geocentrism was – eventually succesfully – questioned and disproved by astronomers Copernicus, Galileï, and Kepler in the second half of the 16th century.
Though a lot of people apparently still haven't received the memo.
Minimalist
Forum Moderator
Posts: 16036
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 1:09 pm
Location: Arizona

Re: Headstrong, stupid, or both?

Post by Minimalist »

but seriously flawed,

Yes...in the sense that he didn't make it all the way.
Something is wrong here. War, disease, death, destruction, hunger, filth, poverty, torture, crime, corruption, and the Ice Capades. Something is definitely wrong. This is not good work. If this is the best God can do, I am not impressed.

-- George Carlin
dannan14
Posts: 481
Joined: Thu Mar 06, 2008 2:47 pm

Re: Headstrong, stupid, or both?

Post by dannan14 »

kb, if you do decide to go send me a pm. i grew up in the Bend and can point you towards restaurants, bars, sights, etc.

EDIT: lol, i just caught up to the subject matter. i just saw South Bend and ND and piped in. i'm a little surprised about the location. Maybe they picked that hotel since nestled between Notre Dame and St Mary's campuses. Maybe they think that will lend some credibility to the conference. My guess is the televangelist on the south side of town set this up. Side note, the televangelist's dome/church/temple thingy is right across the street from a golf course. We used to tee off to try to hit the roof of his building :D Unfortunately, we never found out how much damage we caused.
Rokcet Scientist

Re: Headstrong, stupid, or both?

Post by Rokcet Scientist »

Minimalist wrote:
but seriously flawed,
Yes...in the sense that he didn't make it all the way.
But his expedition did, and that was the point (his and mine).

The 'seriously flawed' comment was meant to indicate there were many circumnavigations and ocean crossings long before De Magalhães' expedition that were not recorded/recognized by 'the west', and still aren't, but actually happened none-the-less!
Leif Erickson's around 1,000 AD was one, and the Irish monks' around 600 AD another one that we actually know about but still don't officially recognize. Most people and the science establishment are blissfully unaware of the Phoenician/Carthaginian and Chinese BC circumnavigations in the 1st and 2nd millennia BC, or of the Solutrean crossing(s) of the Atlantic around 18,000 BC, or of the proto-indian crossings from Asia before that, or even less of the HE circumnavigation/trek to the Americas via Asia a half million years before that.
uniface

Re: Headstrong, stupid, or both?

Post by uniface »

Copied from another post (The Elephant in the American Livingroom)

Despite the predictable weak and superficial rebuttal by the wiki mentality, Las Lunas is solid evidence of Phoenician presence in the American Southwest. One decent account :
http://www.truthontheweb.org/comstone.htm
Rokcet Scientist

Re: Headstrong, stupid, or both?

Post by Rokcet Scientist »

uniface wrote:Copied from another post (The Elephant in the American Livingroom)

Despite the predictable weak and superficial rebuttal by the wiki mentality, Las Lunas is solid evidence of Phoenician presence in the American Southwest. One decent account :
http://www.truthontheweb.org/comstone.htm
In the "American Southwest"?
Min, have you dug up your yard yet?
Minimalist
Forum Moderator
Posts: 16036
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 1:09 pm
Location: Arizona

Re: Headstrong, stupid, or both?

Post by Minimalist »

Nope. The nazi sheriff we have would assume I was digging a tunnel for Mexicans.
Something is wrong here. War, disease, death, destruction, hunger, filth, poverty, torture, crime, corruption, and the Ice Capades. Something is definitely wrong. This is not good work. If this is the best God can do, I am not impressed.

-- George Carlin
Post Reply