Can't We Just Vote Him Off The Island?

Post by **Minimalist** » Thu Aug 03, 2006 6:04 pm

it is a valid one with archaeological evidence to support it

Damn.

You were doing so well right up to the end.

marduk · Post by **marduk** » Thu Aug 03, 2006 7:00 pm

"If i don't speak out for the right to free speech, who will?"

you're making the mistake of thinking this site has a constitution
it doesn't
and i think we all know who the poster you spoke out against was when in fact it was only after you were warned repeatedly and politely that you were overstepping the bounds of propriety and were losing your credibility hand over fist that you ran screaming to mummy with lies on your lips like a good christian

so what was your handle at hall of maat
or should i guess

Post by **Minimalist** » Thu Aug 03, 2006 7:11 pm

you're making the mistake of thinking this site has a constitution

True.

Michelle is our Benevolent Board Despot and she can run it any way she likes.

Personally, that's fine with me.

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Fri Aug 04, 2006 2:08 am

and i think we all know who the poster you spoke out against was when in fact it was only after you were warned repeatedly and politely that you were overstepping the bounds of propriety and were losing your credibility hand over fist that you ran screaming to mummy with lies on your lips like a good christian

not even worth a response and no you don't.

so what was your handle at hall of maat
or should i guess

i am not impressed with the layout of the HM so i doubt if i will return their veryoften and i am not going to spoil my reason for changing i.d's. i am not that important that you need to hunt down every i.d. i use and expose me when my posts will eventually do that anyways.

your obssession with me borders on the psychotic and you need to chill, i just present myside and i am not twisting your arm to read them or believe them.

marduk · Post by **marduk** » Fri Aug 04, 2006 6:49 am

your obssession with me borders on the psychotic and you need to chill

I have no obsession with you whatsoever
you seem to think I came here to persecute you
thats wrong
you seem to think I am anti christian
thats wrong too
I came here because Archaeologica news has been set as my home page for over a year and i finally decided to look at the forums
so the answer is Arch that you're just paranoid
which is why you don't want anyone to know you're other I'ds
i use the same one everywhere i post
you don't because of your mental difficulty in accepting the truth
I have better ways to waste my time than in hunting down someone irrelevant like you on the internet who doesn't know anything about real history
get over yourself will ya

stan · Post by **stan** » Sat Aug 05, 2006 5:39 pm

Marduk,
just overlook arch. Don't read his posts, and
don't respond to him.
It's not hard.
In a way, you and Minimalist especially, are
enabling arch to be more important here than he should be.
I really hate it that he takes any of your time and energy
away from writing great posts on things you know about and are interested in.
Stan

marduk · Post by **marduk** » Sat Aug 05, 2006 5:44 pm

Done
Arch is now in coventry
and if anyone asks Stan you can tell them that you sorted it out
Arch if you're reading this an I know you will don't bother to respond to any of my posts in future,
you've already proved yourself incapable of understanding my point of view anyway so its no loss for you is it (I'm sure you also think the same of me)

that way you might actually realise that I came here to contribute to the discussion and not to persecute you
because I don't actually know who you are
besides which
at no time have i ever persecuted anyone on the internet
like i said
i have better ways to waste my time

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Sat Aug 05, 2006 8:56 pm

Arch if you're reading this an I know you will don't bother to respond to any of my posts in future,

you should never say things like this to me as now i will look at them a lot harder.

because I don't actually know who you are
besides which
at no time have i ever persecuted anyone on the internet

excuse me, aren't you the one who suggested to shoot me and you would bring the bullets? i am amazed michelle let you stay after that post. i just present my perspective and feel they are valid eventhough the secular world tries its best to eliminate something that is beyond their control.

you can pretend all you want to that that aspect doesn't exist but you are just fooling yourself...

Post by **Minimalist** » Sat Aug 05, 2006 10:13 pm

aren't you the one who suggested to shoot me and you would bring the bullets?

Wow. Really?

I must have missed that one.

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Sun Aug 06, 2006 3:50 am

you were oposition to him but hereit is again:

i vote we shoot him and i'd be happy to pay for the bullets
he'll probably go along with it willingly if you tell him he's going to be a martyr

marduk · Post by **marduk** » Sun Aug 06, 2006 7:19 am

i was going to respond to this post and point out that if i was after you as you claimed and meant that comment in any way but humour i would have already payed for the bullets and shot you myself
but as per the agreement i won't

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Sun Aug 06, 2006 1:30 pm

sorry but i don't view it as humorous nor does it belong on a forum. you went too far.

marduk · Post by **marduk** » Sun Aug 06, 2006 1:58 pm

blah blah blah

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Sun Aug 06, 2006 11:47 pm

blah blah blah

another reason why i think you should not be here.

why is it that when you are asked to provide source material you can't do it?

john · Post by **john** » Sun Aug 06, 2006 11:55 pm

archaeologist wrote:
blah blah blah
another reason why i think you should not be here.

why is it that when you are asked to provide source material you can't do it?

purposeful misunderstanding and aggressive accusation in order to attract attention to yourself gets old in a hurry. find a life, any life.

john