Digit wrote:But unless you are interested in these vociferous debates by 19th century French academicians, I would not bother with the book.
I read a lot of it when I was younger, the largest load of horse manure I've ever come across. The results and opinion expressed at that time were a mixture of racism, nationalism, professional jealousy and a lot of unverified guesswork.
So- what else is new?
Then, as now, a lot of it was caused by Christian sensibilities. They slammed Schleimann out of the idea that *only* Christian Scripture was history, all the rest was pure 'myth'. the Amazons, At Lunus, the Golden Age of Peace, all in one way or other challenge Christian dogma, and they really went ballistic over Ryan & Pitman's "Noah's Flood".
There's something in the Levantine religions in particular which wants to erase or debunk all history but that which they have created. The Taliban blowing up the Buddhas is only the most obvious example.
One of the photos Curtis shows is of a cave expedition, which included a French priest to perform exorcism of the demonic forces the artwork represented. [ When you bang your head on the keyboard over news like this, try to avoid the control keys ]
The doubters that the Neanderthals could have spirituality is evidence in my mind that 'they protest too much', and in fact lack that which they do not see in others. Curtis throws them a crumb by saying the the Neanderthal at Shanidar only has pollen with him, suggesting that it may have been brought in by rodents.
He dunno that rats would not have anything whatever to do with Cyanus Centaurea. It causes sterility and abortions. Missing from his analysis also are any acoustic experiments, or even computer reconstructions of the cave profile when it was in use as a sacred space.
Any god watching me hasta be bored, and needs to get a life.