Sea People
Moderators: MichelleH, Minimalist, JPeters
-
- Forum Moderator
- Posts: 16033
- Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 1:09 pm
- Location: Arizona
http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite? ... 2FShowFull
From todays Archaeologica News.That was the bad news. The good news was that beneath the mostly-destroyed Philistine village was something the group hadn't expected - a massive late Bronze Age settlement. "In terms of construction, the Bronze Age settlement was huge," Rosen says. "We have mud brick walls two meters thick and structures 10-15 meters across preserved more than a meter high, all underneath the ground. It's amazing - mud brick doesn't last, so finding this kind of thing is very exciting."
Sea Peoples
Back on topic. Submitted for a review by all those interested in the relationship between the Phoenicians and Sea Peoples' invasions. I had noted early on that Phoenician cities were not attacked except for Alwad ... and the Hittites were responsible for that one.
http://www.phoenician.org/sea_peoples.htm
http://www.phoenician.org/sea_peoples.htm
Natural selection favors the paranoid
-
- Forum Moderator
- Posts: 16033
- Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 1:09 pm
- Location: Arizona
It's a good article...but I think they have the cart before the horse.
It seems as if the Sea Peoples were the ones who took down the Late Bronze Age kingdoms, judging by the diplomatic correspondence among the various sites.
And the Egyptians did not withdraw from Canaan until c 1140 BC.[/quote]
It seems as if the Sea Peoples were the ones who took down the Late Bronze Age kingdoms, judging by the diplomatic correspondence among the various sites.
And the Egyptians did not withdraw from Canaan until c 1140 BC.[/quote]
Something is wrong here. War, disease, death, destruction, hunger, filth, poverty, torture, crime, corruption, and the Ice Capades. Something is definitely wrong. This is not good work. If this is the best God can do, I am not impressed.
-- George Carlin
-- George Carlin
-
- Forum Moderator
- Posts: 16033
- Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 1:09 pm
- Location: Arizona
Re: Sea Peoples
Cognito wrote:Back on topic. Submitted for a review by all those interested in the relationship between the Phoenicians and Sea Peoples' invasions. I had noted early on that Phoenician cities were not attacked except for Alwad ... and the Hittites were responsible for that one.
http://www.phoenician.org/sea_peoples.htm
Surprisingly for such a pivotal moment in world history, the events which took place at that time are not well understood and are widely debated.
It isn't surprising at all. The Vandals, Goths, and Huns did not have their own historians. What we know of them comes largely from Roman writers. I imagine the Sea Peoples were too busy killing and looting to bother much with keeping a chronicle of what they did....and their victims didn't have much of a chance to write.
Something is wrong here. War, disease, death, destruction, hunger, filth, poverty, torture, crime, corruption, and the Ice Capades. Something is definitely wrong. This is not good work. If this is the best God can do, I am not impressed.
-- George Carlin
-- George Carlin
Who, Me?
Digit, work has been keeping me incredibly busy over the summer (I just acquired 25 more employees) with a variety of other interests also coming into play. The only thing I really regret is not sprinting since spring, but it should be back onto the cinders in January. My buddy just told me I would have taken 3rd place in the 100M if I had showed up to the World Games in Italy --- aaaarrrrgggghhhh!!!!!:evil:
Natural selection favors the paranoid
Sea Peoples
In the wake of the Sea Peoples' migrations southward by sea and land the fact still remains: Hittites (destroyed), Myceneans (destroyed), Egyptians (weakened). Phoenicians (not affected).It seems as if the Sea Peoples were the ones who took down the Late Bronze Age kingdoms, judging by the diplomatic correspondence among the various sites.

The Phoenicians were right in the center of the fray and not one city sacked or pillaged. On the contrary, they begin a well-documented expansion of their sea trading empire in the 12th century. Coincidence? Hmm.

Natural selection favors the paranoid
-
- Forum Moderator
- Posts: 16033
- Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 1:09 pm
- Location: Arizona
Perhaps the Phoenecians were properly situated to fill the trading vacuum created by the destruction of the other powers? Nature abhors a vacuum.
Something is wrong here. War, disease, death, destruction, hunger, filth, poverty, torture, crime, corruption, and the Ice Capades. Something is definitely wrong. This is not good work. If this is the best God can do, I am not impressed.
-- George Carlin
-- George Carlin
Sea Peoples
Beags, I'm not sure that's possible at this time. If nobody is really sure who the Sea Peoples were, how could we know their genetics?That makes me wonder where they got the DNA markers for the Sea People.
Natural selection favors the paranoid
Exactly my question. I stayed up to watch this show on PBS, and that's what was said. Seems very odd. To expound a little, they said that the Sea People settled in the Levant and probably jump-started the expansion of the Phoenicians in their sea going trade network, but did not intermarry.If nobody is really sure who the Sea Peoples were, how could we know their genetics?
I know, doesn't make sense.