"Inadvertent", My Ass....

Random older topics of discussion

Moderators: MichelleH, Minimalist, JPeters

Guest

Post by Guest »

John, do you mean evolution, or do you mean Darwinian evolution, you didn't specify, you should define your terms so we know what you're talking about!
Guest

Post by Guest »

The science of evolution (which is real, in spite of your foolish beliefs) relates only to one question. Did humanity evolve to its present form?
the answer to that is no but you won't listen. if that is its only purpose then it is of no value.
It does not burn people at the stake if they do not believe it
actually that is only true in a literal sense. what evolutionists do to people who don't believe is astonishing. when a small publisher printed an article on i.d. in his tiny newsletter, the smithsonian went ballistic and you shouldhave seen what they did to that man and he wasn't even a christian.

paint the whole story please.

the rest of your post is not worth responding to as it undermines any credibility you have and denies your claim to objectivity. you have issues you need to deal with...
Guest

Post by Guest »

I'm still trying to figure out if Darwinites think that we morphed from tree shrews or from monkeys, could someone clarify this?
marduk

Post by marduk »

we evolved from the same common ancestor as apes
really Jim
if you're going to ridicule something you really should show that you know what it is you are mocking first
:lol:
Guest

Post by Guest »

And Marduk, what is that "same common ancestor?" (This oughta be good.)
marduk

Post by marduk »

iirc it was called Dryopithecus
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dryopithecus
Guest

Post by Guest »

Then Marduk, why do many Darwinites say it's the tree shrew, and others say the monkey, and others say the "Dryopithecus?"

And Marduk, the wiki says Dryo was an ape, back to the drawing board.
marduk

Post by marduk »

They don't say humans evolved from a tree shrew
you are just misquoting based on your limited understanding of a process that you don't subscribe to
thats fair enough if you don't like it then why push your beliefs on those that do
i don't see anyone smashing you round the head with a hammer screaming "God doesnt exist, God doesnt exist"

Why is it back to the drawing board
apes and humans are cousins
monkeys are an entirely different species
they all had a common ancestory
but you have to go further back to find it
its called Proconsul
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proconsul_(genus)
yes i know you never heard of it
neither has anyone else
Guest

Post by Guest »

They can't decide if the Proconsul is an ape or a monkey, so that makes it our ancestor? That would be a great name for a kid, after a distant ancestor, Proconsul (sounds kinda Goth).
marduk

Post by marduk »

They can't decide if the Proconsul is an ape or a monkey
thats the whole point Jim
its both and neither
its descendants were monkeys and apes
then later we evolved from the apes
we never evolved from monkeys but are realted to them through proconsul
like you are related to Adolf Hitler through a distant ancestor
this is Darwinian evolution
the tree shrews were much earlier
:lol:
and probably more intelligent
(i.e.) they knew staying in the trees was a good idea
:wink:
Guest

Post by Guest »

Can I quote you on that?
marduk

Post by marduk »

well thats just their opinions so quote them
my opinion is that leaving the oceans was the bad idea
:lol:
Guest

Post by Guest »

Do you think that, according to Darwinism, we morphed out of the sea as walking catfish, or as amphibians?

Do you think that the wolf morphed into the whale? (Kinda reminds me of the way Citizen Attorney phrases questions, he's a trip.)
marduk

Post by marduk »

walking catfish are amphibians
doh

Do you think that the wolf morphed into the whale? (Kinda reminds me of the way Citizen Attorney phrases questions, he's a trip.)
now youre really getting confused
wolves morphed into dogs
any 5 year old knows that
go ask one
:lol:
Locked